논문 영어: 서론편 3, 글의 구조 소개 (1~20)

1. The remainder of this paper consists of the following sections.
2. One promising area of investigation is the ethical dimension of software piracy.
3. The balance of this article is organized as follows. 
4. The first integrates the research with extant theories and provides a conceptual basis for the hypotheses.
5. In the next section, we review and discuss prior literature. 
6. The next section provides an overview of software and human agents’ respective capabilities. 
7. The second section presents the experimental design, and the third section presents the results.
8. To understand an individual’s propensity to pirate software, we develop and test a model of ethical decision making based on the four-component model of morality.
9. Subsequently we detail in turn the research method.
10. We then discuss the theoretical model and hypotheses of this paper.
11. The components of the model are outlined in the next section and some are reinterpreted to incorporate other models of ethical decision making.
12. The fourth and final sections document the implications of the results for management practices and future research and the limitations of the study.
13. The veracity of the new model is then tested using a sample of 243 students.
14. In the fourth section, we explain the data and measurement.
15. The analysis and results are presented, followed by a discussion of the results and their managerial implications.
16. Tests for differences based on age and gender are also conducted.
17. Based on a deeper understanding of the KC process, we contend that no one “right” approach enables it.
18. We then use these percentiles to develop our recommendations for different local standards. 
19. Rather, design should reflect the ways participants engage in the KC process, individually or collectively. 
20. We find support for the model and for age-based differences but only limited support for gender-based differences.
21. We conclude the paper with directions for future research.
22. We conclude by drawing implications and recommendations for the Information Systems discipline as a whole.
23. We conclude with a discussion of future research directions.